|
Re: Qustion about Questions about data placement
You can monitor the output of pool query that reports the space usage on PMEM and SSD separately.
That been said, we don’t have a metric reporting the total amount of data migrated by aggregation
You can monitor the output of pool query that reports the space usage on PMEM and SSD separately.
That been said, we don’t have a metric reporting the total amount of data migrated by aggregation
|
By
Lombardi, Johann
·
#1722
·
|
|
Re: Qustion about Questions about data placement
Is there a way to know how much data has been migrated from PMEM to SSD
Is there a way to know how much data has been migrated from PMEM to SSD
|
By
段世博
·
#1721
·
|
|
Re: Qustion about Questions about data placement
Extents smaller than 4KiB that cannot be aggregated with other contiguous extents remain in PMEM and are not migrated to SSDs.
As for overwrites, extents that are eventually not readable any longer
Extents smaller than 4KiB that cannot be aggregated with other contiguous extents remain in PMEM and are not migrated to SSDs.
As for overwrites, extents that are eventually not readable any longer
|
By
Lombardi, Johann
·
#1720
·
|
|
Re: Qustion about Questions about data placement
Thank you very much for your answer!
I have another question: whether all the data written to PMEM will be written to SSD, for example under Zipfian workload, if the data still in PMEM is overwritten
Thank you very much for your answer!
I have another question: whether all the data written to PMEM will be written to SSD, for example under Zipfian workload, if the data still in PMEM is overwritten
|
By
段世博
·
#1719
·
|
|
Re: Qustion about Questions about data placement
By default, any contiguous extents strictly smaller than 4KiB are written to SCM and the ones bigger than or equal to 4KiB are written to SSDs.
The 4KiB threshold is configurable starting DAOS v2.0
By default, any contiguous extents strictly smaller than 4KiB are written to SCM and the ones bigger than or equal to 4KiB are written to SSDs.
The 4KiB threshold is configurable starting DAOS v2.0
|
By
Lombardi, Johann
·
#1718
·
|
|
Re: DAOS 2.3.103
#rocky
#ubuntu
#chat
#docker
#installation
In this case, the core problem is that there is an empty storage tier in the configuration, and the config parser doesn’t handle this correctly. Createdhttps://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-12826
In this case, the core problem is that there is an empty storage tier in the configuration, and the config parser doesn’t handle this correctly. Createdhttps://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-12826
|
By
Macdonald, Mjmac
·
#1717
·
|
|
Re: DAOS 2.3.103
#rocky
#ubuntu
#chat
#docker
#installation
Hi there,
scm prepare is only required when using Optane PMEM. Since you use DRAM, you don’t need to run scm prepare.
That being said, it would be great for scm prepare to fail nicely in this
Hi there,
scm prepare is only required when using Optane PMEM. Since you use DRAM, you don’t need to run scm prepare.
That being said, it would be great for scm prepare to fail nicely in this
|
By
Lombardi, Johann
·
#1716
·
|
|
DAOS 2.3.103
#rocky
#ubuntu
#chat
#docker
#installation
I'm trying to set up daos 2.3.103 using the EL8 Dockerfile but I ended up with this error when trying to run scm prepare
this is what my configuration file looks like
I also tried this with the
I'm trying to set up daos 2.3.103 using the EL8 Dockerfile but I ended up with this error when trying to run scm prepare
this is what my configuration file looks like
I also tried this with the
|
By
salma.salem@...
·
#1715
·
|
|
Qustion about Questions about data placement
How does DAOS decide whether to write data to SSD or PMEM?
How does DAOS decide whether to write data to SSD or PMEM?
|
By
段世博
·
#1714
·
|
|
Re: Fail to create pool
Tianzy,
Good to hear it is working now, however in general reboot should not be needed after applying those sysctl settings; dual_iface_server test also worked before... I wonder if there was
Tianzy,
Good to hear it is working now, however in general reboot should not be needed after applying those sysctl settings; dual_iface_server test also worked before... I wonder if there was
|
By
Oganezov, Alexander A
·
#1713
·
|
|
Re: Fail to create pool
Alex,
For some reasons, my cluster rebooted. After that, I tried what you have said. My issue is fixed!
I guess after applying
Alex,
For some reasons, my cluster rebooted. After that, I tried what you have said. My issue is fixed!
I guess after applying
|
By
landen.tian@...
·
#1712
·
|
|
Re: Fail to create pool
Can you change log_mask: debug in daos server yaml file and provide logs from all engines involved?
On a client side please provide ofi logs by doing export FI_LOG_LEVEL=warn before running
Can you change log_mask: debug in daos server yaml file and provide logs from all engines involved?
On a client side please provide ofi logs by doing export FI_LOG_LEVEL=warn before running
|
By
Oganezov, Alexander A
·
#1711
·
|
|
Re: Fail to create pool
1、 https://docs.daos.io/v2.0/admin/predeployment_check/#setup-for-multiple-network-links
Lombardi had pointed out it and I had done it.
2. the test:
Any further suggestion?
1、 https://docs.daos.io/v2.0/admin/predeployment_check/#setup-for-multiple-network-links
Lombardi had pointed out it and I had done it.
2. the test:
Any further suggestion?
|
By
landen.tian@...
·
#1710
·
|
|
Re: Fail to create pool
Hi Tian,
I noticed that you are running 2 engines per node. Did you follow this guide in order to set sysctl settings
Hi Tian,
I noticed that you are running 2 engines per node. Did you follow this guide in order to set sysctl settings
|
By
Oganezov, Alexander A
·
#1709
·
|
|
Re: Fail to create pool
CART didn't work
By
landen.tian@...
·
#1708
·
|
|
Re: Fail to create pool
It makes progress either, but it still failed.
client01:
On storage01:
03/03-08:17:03.29 storage01 DAOS[13113/0/614] daos INFO src/engine/drpc_progress.c:278 drpc_handler_ult() dRPC handler ULT for
It makes progress either, but it still failed.
client01:
On storage01:
03/03-08:17:03.29 storage01 DAOS[13113/0/614] daos INFO src/engine/drpc_progress.c:278 drpc_handler_ult() dRPC handler ULT for
|
By
landen.tian@...
·
#1707
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Fail to create pool
That’s progress! IIUC, you have 5x 3.8TB = 19TB per engine, so 20TB is probably too much. Could you please try with a smaller nvme-size? Since you use 2.2, you could also run “dmg pool create
That’s progress! IIUC, you have 5x 3.8TB = 19TB per engine, so 20TB is probably too much. Could you please try with a smaller nvme-size? Since you use 2.2, you could also run “dmg pool create
|
By
Lombardi, Johann
·
#1706
·
|
|
Re: Fail to create pool
Lombardi,
Glad to see your response!
I followed https://docs.daos.io/v2.2/admin/predeployment_check/#multi-railnic-setup, error is changed from DER_HG(-1020) to
Lombardi,
Glad to see your response!
I followed https://docs.daos.io/v2.2/admin/predeployment_check/#multi-railnic-setup, error is changed from DER_HG(-1020) to
|
By
landen.tian@...
·
#1705
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Questions about daos evolution and design
I see, so it looks to me same to the question 4 of "append write"? Hope my answer is helpful.
Thanks
-Niu
I see, so it looks to me same to the question 4 of "append write"? Hope my answer is helpful.
Thanks
-Niu
|
By
Niu, Yawei
·
#1704
·
|
|
Re: Questions about daos evolution and design
Q3:I mean ROW(Redirect-on-write ) .
Thanks
-Lin
Q3:I mean ROW(Redirect-on-write ) .
Thanks
-Lin
|
By
hongxunlinpub@...
·
#1703
·
|